Wherry v Leichhardt Council [2011] NSWLEC 1312
The application, as amended and including agreed consent orders and conditions, does not cause unreasonable impacts on neighbouring amenity, views, privacy, or traffic, satisfies planning controls, and merits approval under s 96.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lynette Wherry; Respondent: Leichhardt Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 September 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Consent Orders After Refusal of Modification Application
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld, modification application approved subject to conditions.
- Legal Topics
- Development Application Modification, Heritage Conservation, Amenity Impacts, Traffic Impacts
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynette Wherry
Applicant
Leichhardt Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Consent Orders After Refusal of Modification Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed modification should be approved under s 96 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979
- 2 Whether the modification would have unreasonable impacts on amenity, views, privacy, and traffic
Ratio Decidendi
The application, as amended and including agreed consent orders and conditions, does not cause unreasonable impacts on neighbouring amenity, views, privacy, or traffic, satisfies planning controls, and merits approval under s 96.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld, modification application approved subject to conditions.
Orders
- The appeal be upheld.
- Modification application No M/2010/169 made pursuant to s 96 Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 to modify Development Consent No D/2006/605 in relation to premises at 7 Little Edward Street, Balmain be approved subject to the conditions contained in Annexure A.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment