Scanlan v Regina [2006] NSWCCA 238
The appellant's grounds of appeal were not made out; appropriate directions were given by the trial judge, no bias or misdirection occurred, there was no miscarriage of justice, and the sentence imposed was within the proper range having regard to aggravating circumstances.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 August 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Appeal against conviction dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['larceny as a Clerk' 'obtain Money by Deception' 'lies Direction' 'bias' 'onus of Proof' 'incompetence of Trial Counsel' 'totality and Accumulation of Sentences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether trial judge misdirected the jury resulting in miscarriage of justice' 'Whether trial judge was biased in summing up and evidentiary rulings' 'Whether trial judge misdirected jury as to onus of proof' 'Whether trial counsel was incompetent' 'Whether witness gave false evidence/perjury' 'Whether sentences imposed were manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's grounds of appeal were not made out; appropriate directions were given by the trial judge, no bias or misdirection occurred, there was no miscarriage of justice, and the sentence imposed was within the proper range having regard to aggravating circumstances.
Court Disposition
Appeal against conviction dismissed. Leave to appeal against sentence granted, appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Appeal against conviction dismissed.' 'Leave to appeal against sentence granted.' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment