Lynne Redan and Phillip Redan v Manly Council [2006] NSWLEC 384
The appeal is dismissed because the proposed development would decrease open space below required levels, adversely affect the setting and aesthetics of a heritage area, and would have a negative impact on the streetscape, contrary to the relevant planning controls and objectives.
- Parties
- Applicant: Lynne Redan; Applicant: Phillip Redan; Respondent: Manly Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment at First Instance (land and Environment Court)
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; development application refused
- Legal Topics
- Development Applications, Urban Design, Streetscape, Open Space, Heritage, Environmental Planning
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Lynne Redan
Applicant
Phillip Redan
Applicant
Manly Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under S 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 / Judgment at First Instance (land and Environment Court)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposal complies with open space requirements under the RDCP and MLEP
- 2 Impact of the proposed car parking on heritage and streetscape
- 3 Whether the proposal is consistent with the objectives and provisions of applicable planning instruments
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is dismissed because the proposed development would decrease open space below required levels, adversely affect the setting and aesthetics of a heritage area, and would have a negative impact on the streetscape, contrary to the relevant planning controls and objectives.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; development application refused
Orders
- The appeal under s 97 of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 is dismissed.
- Development application No 478/05 lodged with Manly Council on 1 November 2005 is refused development consent.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment