VZM [2020] NSWCATGD 25
The use of bed rails for VZM does not constitute a restrictive practice or physical restraint under the Principles because her physical condition, not the bed rails, restricts her movement; therefore, a guardianship order is unnecessary as services can be provided without it and such an order would not promote her welfare or interests.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 August 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Guardianship Application / Final Determination After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for guardianship order dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['restrictive Practices' 'consent to Use of Restraint' 'physical Restraint' 'chemical Restraint' 'regulatory Schemes for Restraint' 'substitute Consent']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Guardianship Application / Final Determination After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the use of bed rails for VZM constitutes a restrictive practice or physical restraint under the Quality of Care Principles 2014 (Cth)' 'Whether a guardianship order should be made for VZM to consent to the use of bed rails' 'Practicability of providing services to VZM without a guardianship order' 'Relationship between definitions in Commonwealth legislation (Principles, NDIS Rules) and NSW Guardianship Act']
Ratio Decidendi
The use of bed rails for VZM does not constitute a restrictive practice or physical restraint under the Principles because her physical condition, not the bed rails, restricts her movement; therefore, a guardianship order is unnecessary as services can be provided without it and such an order would not promote her welfare or interests.
Court Disposition
Application for guardianship order dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for a guardianship order for VZM is dismissed after hearing.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment