Benedetti v Seldon & anor [2009] NSWLEC 1019

Benedetti v Seldon & anor [2009] NSWLEC 1019

The applicant did not establish that either tree was located wholly or principally on the respondents' property; therefore the preliminary jurisdictional requirement was not satisfied and the Court lacked jurisdiction to deal with the application.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
21 January 2009
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Extemporaneous Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed.
Legal Topics
['trees on Boundary' 'jurisdiction Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']
['trees (neighbours)'] ['trees on Boundary' 'jurisdiction Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Extemporaneous Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether either of the two trees was located wholly or principally on the respondents' property as required by s 4(3) of the Trees (Disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006." 'Whether the Court had jurisdiction to deal with the application.']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant did not establish that either tree was located wholly or principally on the respondents' property; therefore the preliminary jurisdictional requirement was not satisfied and the Court lacked jurisdiction to deal with the application.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed.

Orders

  • ['The application is dismissed.']