Valassis v M D Nikolaidis & Co. [2000] NSWSC 388
Where a litigant persistently and habitually institutes repetitive applications fundamentally addressing the same issues previously finally determined, such behaviour constitutes the institution of vexatious proceedings within the meaning of Supreme Court Act s 84(2), warranting an order restricting further proceedings without leave of the court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Supreme Court Act S 84(2) / Judgment
- Outcome
- application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['vexatious Litigant' 'leave to Institute Proceedings' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Under Supreme Court Act S 84(2) / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the respondent habitually and persistently instituted vexatious legal proceedings without reasonable ground against the applicant' 'Whether interlocutory applications constitute institution of legal proceedings under s 84(2)' 'Whether the circumstances justify an order restricting further proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Where a litigant persistently and habitually institutes repetitive applications fundamentally addressing the same issues previously finally determined, such behaviour constitutes the institution of vexatious proceedings within the meaning of Supreme Court Act s 84(2), warranting an order restricting further proceedings without leave of the court.
Court Disposition
application granted
Orders
- ['The plaintiff, Dennis Valassis, shall not, without leave of the Court, institute any legal proceedings against M D Nikolaidis and Co. in any Court and shall not continue any legal proceedings already instituted against M D Nikolaidis and Co. in any Court without the leave of the Court.' 'Dennis Valassis to pay the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment