Gaicheri v Hanley [2009] NSWLEC 1159
The respondent did not know or ought not reasonably have known that her trees were causing damage prior to October 2008; it is unreasonable to require her to meet significant rectification costs for past damage, but tree removal is necessary for safety and mitigation of future damage.
- Parties
- Applicant: M Gaicheri; Respondent: E Hanley
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 21 April 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted in part; orders for tree removal and partial compensation.
- Legal Topics
- Tree Disputes, Damage by Tree Roots, Removal of Trees, Compensation for Remedial Works
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
M Gaicheri
Applicant
E Hanley
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application Under Trees (disputes Between Neighbours) Act 2006 / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether trees on respondent's property caused damage to applicant's property
- 2 Whether the respondent should pay for past damage rectification
- 3 Whether trees should be removed to prevent future damage
Ratio Decidendi
The respondent did not know or ought not reasonably have known that her trees were causing damage prior to October 2008; it is unreasonable to require her to meet significant rectification costs for past damage, but tree removal is necessary for safety and mitigation of future damage.
Court Disposition
Application granted in part; orders for tree removal and partial compensation.
Orders
- The respondent is to remove both trees at a height of not more than 300 mm above ground level with the stump of the Tallowood to be poisoned after removal to that height.
- Works are to be carried out by an AQF Level 3 arborist with appropriate insurances.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment