M O v REGINA [2014] NSWCCA 11
The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive as the applicant had a lesser role, no prior convictions, reasonable prospects of rehabilitation, and significant subjective factors; the appropriate sentence was a good behaviour bond under s 9 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 for one year.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 February 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed, sentence quashed, good behaviour bond imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal Against Sentence' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'sentencing Discretion' 'parity Between Co Offenders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Sentence Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether there was a marked disparity between the sentence for the applicant and her co-offender JB' "Whether the applicant's personal circumstances, including being a new mother, were adequately taken into account"]
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive as the applicant had a lesser role, no prior convictions, reasonable prospects of rehabilitation, and significant subjective factors; the appropriate sentence was a good behaviour bond under s 9 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 for one year.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed, sentence quashed, good behaviour bond imposed
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal' 'Allow the appeal' 'Quash sentence imposed by Lakatos DCJ on 8 November 2013' 'Order that the applicant be discharged upon her entering a good behaviour bond for a period of 1 year from the date it is entered into']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment