M111 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1625

M111 of 2003 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCA 1625

The Tribunal did not fail to observe procedural fairness and did not identify the wrong issue. The Tribunal made explicit findings on the applicants' claims of imputed association with the LTTE and considered all relevant evidence. No reviewable error was established; the application for orders nisi, including writs of certiorari and prohibition, was refused.

Parties
Applicant: M111 of 2003; First Respondent: Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs; Second Respondent: B F Kissane, sitting as the Refugee Review Tribunal; Second Respondent: Adolfo Gentile, in his capacity as Senior Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 December 2003
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Remittal From High Court
Outcome
Application for orders nisi refused; applicants to pay respondents' costs.
Legal Topics
Judicial Review, Procedural Fairness, Protection Visas, Jurisdictional Error
Administrative Law Immigration Law Judicial Review Procedural Fairness Protection Visas Jurisdictional Error

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

M111 of 2003

Applicant

Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs

First Respondent

B F Kissane, sitting as the Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Adolfo Gentile, in his capacity as Senior Member of the Refugee Review Tribunal

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment on Remittal From High Court

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal failed to observe procedural fairness in relying on cable CL98 without providing the applicants an opportunity to respond
  2. 2 Whether the Tribunal identified the correct issue in reviewing the applicants' protection visa claims
  3. 3 Whether the Tribunal's decision was affected by reviewable error

Ratio Decidendi

The Tribunal did not fail to observe procedural fairness and did not identify the wrong issue. The Tribunal made explicit findings on the applicants' claims of imputed association with the LTTE and considered all relevant evidence. No reviewable error was established; the application for orders nisi, including writs of certiorari and prohibition, was refused.

Court Disposition

Application for orders nisi refused; applicants to pay respondents' costs.

Orders

  • The application for orders nisi for the issue of writs of certiorari and prohibition be refused.
  • The applicants pay the respondents' costs of and incidental to the application.