M162 of 2002 v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (No 2) [2004] FCA 23
No jurisdictional error was established; the Tribunal addressed all claims properly before it, and was not required to consider treatment as returnees absent such a claim. There being no real prospects of success, the extension of time for relief is refused and the application dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 January 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Migration Application for Prerogative Writs / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Substantive Relief
- Outcome
- Application for extension of time dismissed; application otherwise dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'prerogative Writs' 'extension of Time' 'jurisdictional Error' 'remedies Against Minister and Tribunal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration Application for Prerogative Writs / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time and Substantive Relief
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the Tribunal failed to consider the applicants' status as returnees when refusing a protection visa." 'Whether the application for certiorari and mandamus, brought out of time, should be granted an extension of time.' 'Whether prohibition should be the principal relief sought against the Minister.']
Ratio Decidendi
No jurisdictional error was established; the Tribunal addressed all claims properly before it, and was not required to consider treatment as returnees absent such a claim. There being no real prospects of success, the extension of time for relief is refused and the application dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for extension of time dismissed; application otherwise dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Application for extension of time to apply for writs of certiorari and mandamus dismissed.' 'Application otherwise dismissed.' "Applicant to pay the respondent's costs of and incidental to the application, including any reserved costs."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment