MAA Consultancy Pty Ltd v Fairfield City Council [2019] NSWLEC 1450
The use of the unauthorised works and modified landscaping is substantially the same as the originally approved development, has minimal environmental impact, and does not contravene relevant planning objectives; therefore, the modification application is approved.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 September 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['modification Application' 'unauthorised Works' 'floor Space Ratio (fsr)' 'landscaping Requirements' 'substantially the Same Development' 'environmental Impact']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the modified development is substantially the same as originally approved' 'Whether the proposed modifications have minimal environmental impact' 'Whether the objectives of the planning instruments are satisfied given unauthorised works and exceedance of the floor space ratio']
Ratio Decidendi
The use of the unauthorised works and modified landscaping is substantially the same as the originally approved development, has minimal environmental impact, and does not contravene relevant planning objectives; therefore, the modification application is approved.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Modification Application 731.2/2011 for use of existing, unauthorised works relating to extensions of a two storey dwelling including creating a dining area, additional bedroom and alfresco area on Lot 105 DP 1159914, also known as 23 Cuthbert Crescent, Edensor Park is approved subject to...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment