Sharma v R [2022] NSWCCA 190
The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offending, the proper application of the plea of guilty discount to the indicative sentences, and the absence of any specific error by the sentencing judge. Comparative cases were distinguishable and did not support a conclusion of...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 September 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'appeal' 'sexual Offences' 'use of Intoxicating Substances to Facilitate Offence' 'recording Intimate Images Without Consent' 'manifest Excess' 'application of Plea Discount' 'totality Principle']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Appeal Against Sentence Application for Leave and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive' 'Whether the sentencing judge erred in the application of the 25% plea of guilty discount' 'Whether comparison with sentences in other similar cases demonstrates manifest excess']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the objective seriousness of the offending, the proper application of the plea of guilty discount to the indicative sentences, and the absence of any specific error by the sentencing judge. Comparative cases were distinguishable and did not support a conclusion of manifest excess. The appeal was therefore dismissed.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Appeal dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment