Mabani Developments v Fairfield City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1172

Mabani Developments v Fairfield City Council [2016] NSWLEC 1172

Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision and make orders giving effect to the agreement.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
06 May 2016
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders
Outcome
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Under S 34(3)' 'consent Orders']
['planning and Environment Law'] ['development Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Under S 34(3)' 'consent Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Class 1 Development Application / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Between the Parties; Orders

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 had been reached between the parties as to the terms of a decision acceptable to the parties.' 'Whether the decision was one that the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions.' "Whether the proceedings should be disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement."]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 as to the terms of a decision acceptable to them, and the Commissioner was satisfied that the decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the Court was required to dispose of the proceedings in accordance with that decision and make orders giving effect to the agreement.

Court Disposition

Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.

Orders

  • ["Final orders to give effect to the parties' agreement were made on 06 May 2016."]