Roberts and Ors v Ballina Shire Council and Anor [2001] NSWLEC 242
Clause 12(3)(a)(ii) of the Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987 is a development standard amenable to variation under SEPP 1, and SEPP 1 may lawfully be used to vary this standard in the circumstances of the case; whether such variation should occur is a question for the merits hearing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 October 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Proceedings / Preliminary Questions of Law
- Outcome
- Preliminary questions of law answered. The matter proceeds to a merits hearing.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Standards' 'local Environmental Plan' 'flexibility in Planning Controls' 'state Environmental Planning Policy No 1 (sepp 1)' 'minimum Lot Size Requirements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Proceedings / Preliminary Questions of Law
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is cl 12(3)(a)(ii) of Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987 a development standard to which SEPP 1 may apply?' 'Can SEPP 1 be used to vary the 40 hectare development standard in cl 12(3)(a)(ii) in this case as a matter of law?']
Ratio Decidendi
Clause 12(3)(a)(ii) of the Ballina Local Environmental Plan 1987 is a development standard amenable to variation under SEPP 1, and SEPP 1 may lawfully be used to vary this standard in the circumstances of the case; whether such variation should occur is a question for the merits hearing.
Court Disposition
Preliminary questions of law answered. The matter proceeds to a merits hearing.
Orders
- ['Clause 12(3)(a)(ii) is a development standard to which SEPP 1 may apply.' 'SEPP 1 may be used to vary the development standard in cl 12(3)(a)(ii); whether it is so used is a matter for the merits hearing.' 'Costs reserved.' 'The class 1 appeal should proceed to hearing on 24 - 25 October 2001.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment