MacDonald v Beare [1904] HCA 22
There is nothing in the Games, Wagers and Betting Houses Act 1902 (NSW) to require that a special warrant be addressed to a named constable; warrants addressed to members of the police force generally are valid under the common law and were not altered by the Act.
- Parties
- Appellant: MacDonald; Respondent: Beare
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 September 1904
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal (statutory Interpretation) / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Search and Seizure, Form and Validity of Warrants, Interpretation of Statutory Warrant Requirements, Appeals From Magistrate to Supreme Court
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
MacDonald
Appellant
Beare
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal (statutory Interpretation) / Appeal From Supreme Court of New South Wales to High Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether a special warrant under section 4 of the Games, Wagers and Betting Houses Act 1902 (NSW) must be addressed to a constable by name or can be addressed to the police force generally
- 2 Whether the form in the schedule to the Act requires a named person
Ratio Decidendi
There is nothing in the Games, Wagers and Betting Houses Act 1902 (NSW) to require that a special warrant be addressed to a named constable; warrants addressed to members of the police force generally are valid under the common law and were not altered by the Act.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Order of the Supreme Court discharged with costs
- Case remitted to the magistrate for determination with the opinion of the High Court
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment