MACKAY & COMPANY V. BARKER

MACKAY & COMPANY V. BARKER

The driver of the truck was negligent in attempting to pass through a narrow space between a tram and a parked vehicle in circumstances that required a high degree of precision. The plaintiff, in waving forward the truck, did not assume the risk nor was he guilty of contributory negligence, as he was not in a position to judge or bear responsibility for the safe passage.

Parties
Appellant: Mackay & Company; Respondent: Barker
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 September 1951
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Negligence, Contributory Negligence, Assumption of Risk, Motor Vehicle Accident

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Mackay & Company

Appellant

Barker

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 Whether the driver of the truck was negligent in attempting to pass between the tram and the parked vehicle with insufficient space
  2. 2 Whether the plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence by motioning the truck forward
  3. 3 Whether the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk

Ratio Decidendi

The driver of the truck was negligent in attempting to pass through a narrow space between a tram and a parked vehicle in circumstances that required a high degree of precision. The plaintiff, in waving forward the truck, did not assume the risk nor was he guilty of contributory negligence, as he was not in a position to judge or bear responsibility for the safe passage.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed with costs.