Mackenzie Architects International Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2020] NSWLEC 1276

Mackenzie Architects International Pty Ltd v Ku-ring-gai Council [2020] NSWLEC 1276

The applicant's written requests adequately addressed the matters required by clause 4.6(3) of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan, and the proposal was in the public interest as it was consistent with the objectives of the contravened standards and zoning; therefore, development consent was granted despite non-compliance with FSR, height, and site area requirements.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 June 2020
Procedural Posture
Appeal Under Class 1 Development Application / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference
Outcome
Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.
Legal Topics
['development Application' 'non Compliance With Development Standards' 'floor Space Ratio' 'height of Buildings' 'site Requirements for Residential Flat Buildings' 'conciliation Conference']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal Under Class 1 Development Application / Final Orders Following Conciliation Conference

  1. 1 ['Whether development consent should be granted for a residential flat building despite non-compliance with development standards for floor space ratio, height, and site area requirements' "Whether the applicant's requests to deviate from development standards are justified under clause 4.6 of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan (Local Centres) 2012" 'Whether the proposal is in the public interest and consistent with the objectives of the contravened standards and the zoning']

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's written requests adequately addressed the matters required by clause 4.6(3) of the Ku-ring-gai Local Environmental Plan, and the proposal was in the public interest as it was consistent with the objectives of the contravened standards and zoning; therefore, development consent was granted despite non-compliance with FSR, height, and site area requirements.

Court Disposition

Appeal upheld; development application approved subject to conditions.

Orders

  • ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Development Application No. 337/17 (as amended) for the demolition of existing structures and the construction of a residential flat building comprising 36 units, basement parking and associated landscaping, at 1456-1456A Pacific Highway, Turramurra, is approved, subject to the conditions...