Mackenzie Architects International v Ryde City Council [2015] NSWLEC 1468
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were required to be disposed of in accordance with that decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
- Outcome
- Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'multi Unit Dwellings' 'conciliation Conference' 'agreement Between the Parties' 'land and Environment Court Act 1979 S 34(3)']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Development Application Proceedings / Conciliation Conference; Agreement Under S 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 could be made in the proper exercise of the Court's functions."]
Ratio Decidendi
Because the parties reached an agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and the Commissioner was satisfied that the agreed decision was one the Court could have made in the proper exercise of its functions, the proceedings were required to be disposed of in accordance with that decision.
Court Disposition
Proceedings disposed of in accordance with the parties' agreement under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979.
Orders
- ["Final orders were made to give effect to the parties' agreement."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment