Bell v Macquarie Bank Limited [2011] NSWIRComm 6
The Court has power to make supplemental cost orders and to assess costs as a gross sum where the parties liable for costs cannot be located, provided the estimate is logical, fair and reasonable and there is no proper basis to require a full costs assessment.
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Macquarie Bank Limited; Applicant: Macquarie International Capital Markets Limited; Respondent: Michael Charles Bell; Respondent: Charles Joseph Berg
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Consequential Orders / Supplemental Orders to Costs Orders Following Notices of Motion
- Outcome
- Gross sum costs orders made and service dispensed.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Supplemental Orders, Service Dispensed, Gross Sum Costs Orders
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Macquarie Bank Limited
Applicant
Macquarie International Capital Markets Limited
Applicant
Michael Charles Bell
Respondent
Charles Joseph Berg
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Consequential Orders / Supplemental Orders to Costs Orders Following Notices of Motion
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Court should dispense with service of notices of motion
- 2 Whether the Court has power to make supplemental orders regarding assessment of costs
- 3 Whether a gross sum costs order should be made rather than a full costs assessment
Ratio Decidendi
The Court has power to make supplemental cost orders and to assess costs as a gross sum where the parties liable for costs cannot be located, provided the estimate is logical, fair and reasonable and there is no proper basis to require a full costs assessment.
Court Disposition
Gross sum costs orders made and service dispensed.
Orders
- Service of notices of motion dispensed with.
- Mr Bell shall pay the costs of Macquarie Bank Limited and Macquarie International Capital Markets Limited in respect of IRC 6973 of 1997 and 5638 of 2002 in an amount of $300,000.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment