In the Matter of Macquarie Prestige Developments Pty Ltd [2012] NSWSC 1060
The plaintiff has established an offsetting claim only to the quantum of $88,802.37 based on credible evidence of variation orders for rectification of defects. There is insufficient evidence to support offsetting claims for delay or additional damages to any greater amount. Therefore, the statutory demand is to be varied to the substantiated balance, $27,052.38, pursuant to s 459H(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 August 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations – Statutory Demand Variation / Hearing and Orders on Application to Set Aside or Vary Creditor's Statutory Demand
- Outcome
- Creditor's statutory demand varied; no order as to costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['statutory Demand' 'offsetting Claim' 'building Contract' 'rectification of Defects' 'damages for Delay']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations – Statutory Demand Variation / Hearing and Orders on Application to Set Aside or Vary Creditor's Statutory Demand
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether there exists a genuine offsetting claim under s 459G of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) that exceeds or reduces the amount of the creditor's statutory demand;" 'Whether the evidence is sufficient to quantify the offsetting claim;' 'What orders should be made as to costs']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff has established an offsetting claim only to the quantum of $88,802.37 based on credible evidence of variation orders for rectification of defects. There is insufficient evidence to support offsetting claims for delay or additional damages to any greater amount. Therefore, the statutory demand is to be varied to the substantiated balance, $27,052.38, pursuant to s 459H(4) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth).
Court Disposition
Creditor's statutory demand varied; no order as to costs.
Orders
- ["Order pursuant to section 459H(4), that the creditor's statutory demand dated 23 February 2012 be varied by substituting for the amount of the demand the sum of $27,052.38." 'Declare that the demand has had effect as so varied as from the date on which it was served on the plaintiff, namely 23 February 2012.' 'No...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment