Regina v Hall [2001] NSWSC 1125
The murder involved a high degree of criminality and was chilling and cold-blooded, but it did not involve criminality of the highest order. Having regard to the offence, the applicant's age, prior offences, reports of the Serious Offenders Review Council, community safety, remorse, insight, progress toward rehabilitation, abstinence from drugs, and need for future supervision, it was appropriate to redetermine the life sentence by setting a specified term and non-parole period.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentencing / Application for Redetermination of Life Sentence
- Outcome
- Life sentence redetermined; specified term and non-parole period set.
- Legal Topics
- ['redetermination of Life Sentence' 'murder' 'non Parole Period' 'rehabilitation' 'community Safety']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentencing / Application for Redetermination of Life Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the applicant's sentence of penal servitude for life for murder should be redetermined under Schedule 1 of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999." "Whether the seriousness of the murder, the applicant's prior offences, rehabilitation, drug history, gender identity issues, and community safety warranted setting a specified term and non-parole period."]
Ratio Decidendi
The murder involved a high degree of criminality and was chilling and cold-blooded, but it did not involve criminality of the highest order. Having regard to the offence, the applicant's age, prior offences, reports of the Serious Offenders Review Council, community safety, remorse, insight, progress toward rehabilitation, abstinence from drugs, and need for future supervision, it was appropriate to redetermine the life sentence by setting a specified term and non-parole period.
Court Disposition
Life sentence redetermined; specified term and non-parole period set.
Orders
- ['The applicant was resentenced to a term of twenty-two years imprisonment commencing on 1 August 1989 and expiring on 31 July 2011.' 'A non-parole period of sixteen years and six months was set, making the first date on which the applicant will be eligible for release 28 February 2006.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment