Doolan, B.J. v. Magnamail Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 22
The making of false representations regarding the characteristics of goods in a widely distributed mail order catalogue, even for cheap goods likely to attract unsophisticated consumers, warrants penalty under s.53(a), aggravated by lack of verification and prior warnings.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Barry John Doolan; Defendant: Magnamail Pty Limited
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 1982
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing and Disposition After Guilty Plea
- Outcome
- Defendant convicted for three contraventions of s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). Charges in G45, G48, and G138 of 1981 proven; other charges dismissed by consent.
- Legal Topics
- False Representation, Advertising Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Barry John Doolan
Prosecutor
Magnamail Pty Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Prosecution / Sentencing and Disposition After Guilty Plea
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendant made false representations concerning the characteristics of goods sold in breach of s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)
Ratio Decidendi
The making of false representations regarding the characteristics of goods in a widely distributed mail order catalogue, even for cheap goods likely to attract unsophisticated consumers, warrants penalty under s.53(a), aggravated by lack of verification and prior warnings.
Court Disposition
Defendant convicted for three contraventions of s.53(a) of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth). Charges in G45, G48, and G138 of 1981 proven; other charges dismissed by consent.
Orders
- Defendant convicted on three charges (G45 of 1981, G48 of 1981, G138 of 1981).
- Fined $750.00 for G45 of 1981.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment