Kader v Tower Life Australia Limited [2005] NSWDC 7

Kader v Tower Life Australia Limited [2005] NSWDC 7

Because the plaintiff abandoned his claim after adverse evidence undermined his credibility and the evidence showed he made false statements material to his insurance claim and to the proceedings, the case fell within the categories justifying indemnity costs; ordinary costs were insufficient given misleading conduct and the abandonment of proceedings.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
29 September 2005
Procedural Posture
Civil / Ex Tempore Judgment After Plaintiff Abandoned Claim During Trial
Outcome
Orders made for indemnity costs in favour of the defendants; verdict and judgment for each defendant by consent.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'sickness and Accident Policy' 'insurance Misrepresentation']
['insurance Law' 'civil Procedure'] ['costs' 'indemnity Costs' 'sickness and Accident Policy' 'insurance Misrepresentation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Civil / Ex Tempore Judgment After Plaintiff Abandoned Claim During Trial

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether indemnity costs should be awarded against the plaintiff after abandonment of claim' "Whether the plaintiff's conduct justified a departure from ordinary costs"]

Ratio Decidendi

Because the plaintiff abandoned his claim after adverse evidence undermined his credibility and the evidence showed he made false statements material to his insurance claim and to the proceedings, the case fell within the categories justifying indemnity costs; ordinary costs were insufficient given misleading conduct and the abandonment of proceedings.

Court Disposition

Orders made for indemnity costs in favour of the defendants; verdict and judgment for each defendant by consent.

Orders

  • ["Verdict and judgment for each of the defendants on the plaintiff's claims by consent." 'Plaintiff to pay the indemnity costs of each defendant, both for defences and cross-claims.' 'Costs orders made in accordance with signed orders of the defendants.']