Ahmad v R [2021] NSWCCA 30
The sentencing judge erred by not specifically considering the matters in s 23(2) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) when the applicant had provided assistance to authorities, and by failing to specify any attributable discount for that assistance when required. A 5% additional discount was...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 12 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Resentencing
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in respect of ground 1; applicant resentenced.
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'manslaughter' 'joint Criminal Enterprise' 'sentence Discount for Assistance' 'remorse' 'special Circumstances' 'utilitarian Discount' 'resentencing']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence; Resentencing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge failed to attribute a specific discount for assistance to authorities under s 23 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) and R v Ellis' 'Whether there was error in failing to give sufficient weight to remorse' 'Whether there was error in failing to find special circumstances under s 44 Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW)' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge erred by not specifically considering the matters in s 23(2) of the Crimes (Sentencing Procedure) Act 1999 (NSW) when the applicant had provided assistance to authorities, and by failing to specify any attributable discount for that assistance when required. A 5% additional discount was warranted for assistance, and the applicant was accordingly resentenced to a lesser term.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in respect of ground 1; applicant resentenced.
Orders
- ['Grant leave to appeal, confined to ground 1 of the notice of appeal, and otherwise refuse leave to appeal.' 'Appeal allowed.' 'Quash the sentence imposed on 3 September 2020, and in lieu thereof sentence Mahmoud Ahmad to a total sentence of 6 years, comprising a non-parole period of 4 years and 6 months,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment