R v Mahmoud Dib [2002] NSWCCA 409
It could not be established that the trial judge's discretion miscarried in refusing to discharge the jury or stay proceedings, as it was not possible to say any potential prejudice could not be repaired by appropriate jury directions, particularly given the trial was continuing.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 October 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave Under S 5 F of the Crimes Act 1900
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['application for Leave Under S 5 F of the Crimes Act 1900' 'discharge Application' 'trial Judge Discretion' 'jury Direction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave Under S 5 F of the Crimes Act 1900
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the trial judge's discretion miscarried in refusing a discharge or a stay after an impermissible in-court identification and a potentially prejudicial question by the Crown"]
Ratio Decidendi
It could not be established that the trial judge's discretion miscarried in refusing to discharge the jury or stay proceedings, as it was not possible to say any potential prejudice could not be repaired by appropriate jury directions, particularly given the trial was continuing.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['Application for leave under s 5F of the Crimes Act 1900 dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment