El Ali v Tritton [2019] NSWCA 111
Where the innocent party to a contract for sale of land does not accept the repudiation, seeks specific performance in good faith and the contract is ultimately lost through a sale to a third party, damages are to be assessed at the date the remedy of specific performance was no longer available (here, when the property was sold). Damages for increased construction costs, rental, or interest that are unrelated to the contracted property, not proven, or too remote are not recoverable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Mahmoud El Ali; First Respondent: Stephen Wesley Tritton; Second Respondent: Louise Jane Tritton
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2019
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Appellate Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Damages for Breach of Contract, Date of Assessment of Damages, Remedies — Specific Performance, Remoteness of Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Mahmoud El Ali
Appellant
Stephen Wesley Tritton
First Respondent
Louise Jane Tritton
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Appellate Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Proper date for assessment of damages for breach of contract for sale of land where specific performance was sought but ultimately not available
- 2 Remoteness of damages for increased building costs, rental payments, and interest on a loan relating to the breach
- 3 Sufficiency of evidence for assessing loss associated with alternative property, rental, and finance costs
Ratio Decidendi
Where the innocent party to a contract for sale of land does not accept the repudiation, seeks specific performance in good faith and the contract is ultimately lost through a sale to a third party, damages are to be assessed at the date the remedy of specific performance was no longer available (here, when the property was sold). Damages for increased construction costs, rental, or interest that are unrelated to the contracted property, not proven, or too remote are not recoverable.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- Appeal allowed.
- Order 1 made by the primary judge on 13 June 2018 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment