Bobbe v R (No 2) [2021] NSWCCA 150

Bobbe v R (No 2) [2021] NSWCCA 150

There was no evidence of threats, impropriety, or misleading advice sufficient to undermine the integrity of the applicant's guilty pleas. The pleas were entered freely and voluntarily, with the applicant fully advised of his options and consequences. The sentence imposed was not unreasonable or plainly unjust and was within the range available. Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence is refused.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
07 July 2021
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Leave to appeal refused
Legal Topics
['appeals After Guilty Plea' 'withdrawal of Guilty Plea' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'misleading Legal Advice' 'sentencing Procedure']
['criminal Law'] ['appeals After Guilty Plea' 'withdrawal of Guilty Plea' 'manifestly Excessive Sentence' 'misleading Legal Advice' 'sentencing Procedure']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the applicant should be permitted to withdraw his pleas of guilty' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']

Ratio Decidendi

There was no evidence of threats, impropriety, or misleading advice sufficient to undermine the integrity of the applicant's guilty pleas. The pleas were entered freely and voluntarily, with the applicant fully advised of his options and consequences. The sentence imposed was not unreasonable or plainly unjust and was within the range available. Leave to appeal against conviction and sentence is refused.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal refused

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal refused']