Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1173

Rahman v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2001] FCA 1173

The Applicant did not provide grounds or particulars showing reviewable error, and the RRT's adverse decision was based on its assessment that his claims were unsupported, internally inconsistent and implausible, and that he was an entirely unreliable witness. Because credibility assessment was for the RRT and no error of law was shown, the application failed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
20 August 2001
Procedural Posture
Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Hearing and Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed with costs.
Legal Topics
['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'credibility Findings' 'reviewable Error' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']
['immigration' 'administrative Law'] ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'credibility Findings' 'reviewable Error' 'well Founded Fear of Persecution']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Review of Refugee Review Tribunal Decision Affirming Refusal of a Protection Visa / Federal Court Hearing and Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the Refugee Review Tribunal committed any error of law in affirming the delegate's refusal to grant the Applicant a protection visa." "Whether the Tribunal was entitled to reject the Applicant's claims on credibility grounds and because of inconsistencies and implausibilities in his evidence."]

Ratio Decidendi

The Applicant did not provide grounds or particulars showing reviewable error, and the RRT's adverse decision was based on its assessment that his claims were unsupported, internally inconsistent and implausible, and that he was an entirely unreliable witness. Because credibility assessment was for the RRT and no error of law was shown, the application failed.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed with costs.

Orders

  • ['The Application be dismissed.' 'The Applicant pay the costs of the Respondent.']