Del-Ben v Waverley Council [2021] NSWLEC 1178
As the parties agreed and the unauthorised works were removed, and jurisdictional prerequisites under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and s 8.18(4)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied, the Court upheld the appeal and found that the Development Control Order had been sufficiently complied with.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 April 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Miscellaneous Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld
- Legal Topics
- ['development Control Order Appeal' 'exempt and Complying Development' 'unauthorised Building Works' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Miscellaneous Appeal / Final Orders After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Development Control Order No. 3 has been sufficiently complied with' 'Whether jurisdictional prerequisites for making the orders have been satisfied']
Ratio Decidendi
As the parties agreed and the unauthorised works were removed, and jurisdictional prerequisites under s 34(3) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979 and s 8.18(4)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 were satisfied, the Court upheld the appeal and found that the Development Control Order had been sufficiently complied with.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld
Orders
- ['The appeal is upheld.' 'Pursuant to s 8.18(4)(d) of the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979, the Development Control Order No. 3 issued by the Respondent on 17 November 2020 has been sufficiently complied with.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment