Rahman v R [2020] NSWCCA 13
The sentencing judge did not err by referring to 'in this country' when explaining the legal definition of sexual intercourse, as this was to clarify for the offender and fulfil the duty to provide clear reasons. Further, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; it fell within the permissible range for offences of this kind, having regard to comparable sentencing and the offender's circumstances.
- Parties
- Applicant: Maksudur Rahman; Respondent: Regina
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 February 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Leave Granted; Appeal Dismissed
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Appeal Against Sentence, Sexual Assault, Specific Deterrence, Manifest Excess, Sentencing Reasons, Comparable Sentencing
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Maksudur Rahman
Applicant
Regina
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence; Leave Granted; Appeal Dismissed
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentencing judge erred in referring to the sexual act constituting sexual intercourse 'in this country'
- 2 Whether the sentencing judge erred in approach to specific deterrence
- 3 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The sentencing judge did not err by referring to 'in this country' when explaining the legal definition of sexual intercourse, as this was to clarify for the offender and fulfil the duty to provide clear reasons. Further, the sentence imposed was not manifestly excessive; it fell within the permissible range for offences of this kind, having regard to comparable sentencing and the offender's circumstances.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal be granted.
- The appeal be dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment