Duncan v Moore and Ors (No 2) [2000] NSWLEC 28
The proceedings were permanently stayed because there was no evidence that either remaining respondent was likely to offend again, there was little or no practical utility in making orders where the first respondent's posters had been removed and only few remnants were alleged against the second respondent, and the applicant had not established a strong construction case because the election posters were prima facie temporary signs that could fall within cl 25B of the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan and be carried on without consent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 September 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Application Seeking Declaratory and Other Relief Concerning Campaign Posters Fixed to Power Poles / Application for a Stay or Dismissal of the Proceedings
- Outcome
- Proceedings permanently stayed; costs reserved.
- Legal Topics
- ['permanent Stay of Proceedings' 'declaratory Relief' 'development Consent' 'temporary Signs' 'environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979' 'woollahra Local Environmental Plan']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Application Seeking Declaratory and Other Relief Concerning Campaign Posters Fixed to Power Poles / Application for a Stay or Dismissal of the Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proceedings should be permanently stayed or dismissed.' 'Whether there was utility in granting declaratory or injunctive relief concerning campaign posters that had been removed or remained only as few remnants.' 'Whether the applicant had shown a basis for restraining the respondents from future erection of posters.' 'Whether election campaign posters were temporary signs under the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan and could be erected without development consent.']
Ratio Decidendi
The proceedings were permanently stayed because there was no evidence that either remaining respondent was likely to offend again, there was little or no practical utility in making orders where the first respondent's posters had been removed and only few remnants were alleged against the second respondent, and the applicant had not established a strong construction case because the election posters were prima facie temporary signs that could fall within cl 25B of the Woollahra Local Environmental Plan and be carried on without consent.
Court Disposition
Proceedings permanently stayed; costs reserved.
Orders
- ['The exhibits may be returned.' 'The proceedings are permanently stayed.' 'The question of costs is reserved.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment