Byers v Frith (No 3) [2017] NSWDC 451
Because the second and third defendants made genuine, reasonable offers to compromise which were more favourable than the judgment to the plaintiff and open for a reasonable time, and the plaintiff unreasonably rejected those offers, the second and third defendants are entitled to indemnity costs from the day after their respective offers.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Malcolm Byers; First Defendant: Jan Frith; Second Defendant: Kelvin Hutchinson; Third Defendant: Vision In Action Pty Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Application After Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted; indemnity costs awarded to second and third defendants from the relevant dates of their offers.
- Legal Topics
- Costs, Party/party Costs, Indemnity Costs, Offers of Compromise, Calderbank Offers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malcolm Byers
Plaintiff
Jan Frith
First Defendant
Kelvin Hutchinson
Second Defendant
Vision In Action Pty Ltd
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Application After Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the second and third defendants are entitled to have their costs assessed on an indemnity basis following rejection of offers of compromise and Calderbank offers.
Ratio Decidendi
Because the second and third defendants made genuine, reasonable offers to compromise which were more favourable than the judgment to the plaintiff and open for a reasonable time, and the plaintiff unreasonably rejected those offers, the second and third defendants are entitled to indemnity costs from the day after their respective offers.
Court Disposition
Application granted; indemnity costs awarded to second and third defendants from the relevant dates of their offers.
Orders
- Note the application by the second and third defendants for further orders after entry of judgment but within the 14 days allowed under r 36.16(3A) of the Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005.
- Make orders in accordance with paras 2 and 6 of the notice of motion dated 13 July 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment