Malcolm Holdings Pty Ltd v Wingecarribee Shire Council [2018] NSWLEC 1636
The appeal is upheld and the modification application LUA08/1042.03 is approved with conditions as the proposed amendments are limited, substantially the same as the previous approval, and do not result in inconsistency with the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 nor adverse impacts, satisfying relevant legal requirements.
- Parties
- Applicant: Malcolm Holdings Pty Ltd; Respondent: Wingecarribee Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 07 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Class 1 Appeal / Appeal After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld and modification application approved with conditions
- Legal Topics
- Modification Application, Development Consent, Subdivision, Local Government Powers
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Malcolm Holdings Pty Ltd
Applicant
Wingecarribee Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Class 1 Appeal / Appeal After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the modification application LUA08/1042.03 should be approved
- 2 Whether the proposed changes are consistent with Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010
- 3 Whether the Court should dispose of the proceedings in terms agreed by the parties under s 34(3) Land and Environment Court Act 1979
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal is upheld and the modification application LUA08/1042.03 is approved with conditions as the proposed amendments are limited, substantially the same as the previous approval, and do not result in inconsistency with the Wingecarribee Local Environmental Plan 2010 nor adverse impacts, satisfying relevant legal requirements.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld and modification application approved with conditions
Orders
- The applicant is granted leave to amend the modification application by substituting new plans and documentation as identified and annexed to the orders.
- The applicant is to pay the respondent's costs thrown away in the amount of $3,000, inclusive of GST.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment