Potier v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural Affairs [2000] FCA 1662
As the applicant conceded he did not claim a fear within Article 1A(2) of the Refugees Convention, he could not meet the mandatory criterion under s 36(2) of the Migration Act 1958. Thus, neither he nor his daughter could be granted a protection visa. There was no error of law or reviewable ground in the Tribunal's decision, and the application for judicial review was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 December 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Judicial Review / Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for review dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Status' 'judicial Review']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Judicial Review / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a well-founded fear falling within Article 1A(2) of the Refugees Convention is an essential criterion for the grant of a protection visa under the Migration Act 1958']
Ratio Decidendi
As the applicant conceded he did not claim a fear within Article 1A(2) of the Refugees Convention, he could not meet the mandatory criterion under s 36(2) of the Migration Act 1958. Thus, neither he nor his daughter could be granted a protection visa. There was no error of law or reviewable ground in the Tribunal's decision, and the application for judicial review was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for review dismissed
Orders
- ['The application for review be dismissed.' 'The applicant, Malcolm Huntley Potier, pay the costs of the respondent, Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs, in connection with the review.' 'Malcolm Huntley Potier pay the reasonable costs incurred in answering subpoenas issued by him and addressed to the...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment