Potier v R [2014] NSWCCA 177

Potier v R [2014] NSWCCA 177

Mr Potier failed to demonstrate the existence of special or exceptional circumstances justifying a grant of bail pending appeal as required by s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW); the material relied on did not meet the high threshold required, and the bail application was dismissed accordingly.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
28 August 2014
Procedural Posture
Application for Bail Pending Appeal / Decision on Application for Bail
Outcome
Application for bail dismissed
Legal Topics
['bail' 'special or Exceptional Circumstances' 'pending Appeal' 'procedural Requirements for Bail Applications']
['criminal Law'] ['bail' 'special or Exceptional Circumstances' 'pending Appeal' 'procedural Requirements for Bail Applications']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Bail Pending Appeal / Decision on Application for Bail

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether special or exceptional circumstances justifying the grant of bail pending appeal exist under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

Mr Potier failed to demonstrate the existence of special or exceptional circumstances justifying a grant of bail pending appeal as required by s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW); the material relied on did not meet the high threshold required, and the bail application was dismissed accordingly.

Court Disposition

Application for bail dismissed

Orders

  • ['Application for bail dismissed']