Holland v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWSC 916

Holland v State of New South Wales [2014] NSWSC 916

The hearing should be vacated because of the plaintiff's significant non-compliance with court orders and ongoing delay; the plaintiff should pay the costs occasioned by the vacation of the hearing date.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
09 July 2014
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation / Procedural Directions Prior to Hearing
Outcome
Hearing date vacated; costs order against plaintiff
Legal Topics
['vacating Hearing Date' 'non Compliance With Court Timetable' 'costs Orders']
['workers Compensation'] ['vacating Hearing Date' 'non Compliance With Court Timetable' 'costs Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Workers Compensation / Procedural Directions Prior to Hearing

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the hearing date should be vacated due to plaintiff's failure to comply with timetable" 'Whether plaintiff should be ordered to pay costs for vacated hearing']

Ratio Decidendi

The hearing should be vacated because of the plaintiff's significant non-compliance with court orders and ongoing delay; the plaintiff should pay the costs occasioned by the vacation of the hearing date.

Court Disposition

Hearing date vacated; costs order against plaintiff

Orders

  • ['The hearing listed to commence on 11 August 2014 is vacated.' 'The plaintiff is ordered to pay the costs thrown away or occasioned by reason of the vacation of the hearing date.']