Storey v Harmse [2013] NSWSC 1641

Storey v Harmse [2013] NSWSC 1641

Leave to appeal was granted because the Local Court orders were likely decisive and turned on a contestable construction of the Loan Agreement. However, on the proper construction of clauses 1 and 2, the Loan Agreement made the balance repayable on demand when an instalment was not paid; the cause of action...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
08 November 2013
Procedural Posture
Appeal From Local Court Decision; Application for Leave to Appeal / Supreme Court Determination of Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Dismissal of Local Court Proceedings
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted under s 40(2) of the Local Court Act 2007, but the appeal and the proceedings were dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the Supreme Court proceedings.
Legal Topics
['leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision' 'summary Dismissal' 'amendment of Statement of Claim' 'joinder of Trustee in Bankruptcy' 'construction of Loan Agreement' 'accrual of Cause of Action' 'standing to Sue' 'mistake in the Name of a Party']
['civil Procedure' 'limitation of Actions' 'contract Law' 'bankruptcy'] ['leave to Appeal From Interlocutory Decision' 'summary Dismissal' 'amendment of Statement of Claim' 'joinder of Trustee in Bankruptcy' 'construction of Loan Agreement' 'accrual of Cause of Action' 'standing to Sue' 'mistake in the Name of a Party']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal From Local Court Decision; Application for Leave to Appeal / Supreme Court Determination of Leave to Appeal and Appeal From Dismissal of Local Court Proceedings

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether leave to appeal was required and should be granted under s 40(2) of the Local Court Act 2007.' "Whether the Local Court erred by considering the limitation issue before determining the plaintiff's motion to amend the statement of claim and add Morgan Chubb as a plaintiff." 'Whether, on the proper construction of the Loan Agreement, the cause of action accrued on default in payment of an instalment so that the proceedings commenced on 31 October 2012 were statute barred.' 'Whether amendment of the statement of claim and joinder of the trustee in bankruptcy could cure the limitation and standing defects.' 'Whether there was a mistake in the name of a party for the purposes of s 65(2)(b) of the Civil Procedure Act 2005.']

Ratio Decidendi

Leave to appeal was granted because the Local Court orders were likely decisive and turned on a contestable construction of the Loan Agreement. However, on the proper construction of clauses 1 and 2, the Loan Agreement made the balance repayable on demand when an instalment was not paid; the cause of action therefore accrued before 1 November 2006 and was statute barred when proceedings were commenced on 31 October 2012. The proposed amendments and joinder of Mr Chubb could not avoid that result, and Mr Storey lacked standing because the rights under the Loan Agreement had vested in the trustee in bankruptcy and had not been reassigned.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted under s 40(2) of the Local Court Act 2007, but the appeal and the proceedings were dismissed; plaintiff ordered to pay the defendant's costs of the Supreme Court proceedings.

Orders

  • ['There be a grant of leave to appeal under s 40(2) of the Local Court Act but the appeal be dismissed.' 'The proceedings be otherwise dismissed.' "The plaintiff pay the defendant's costs of these proceedings."]