Khudayberganova v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 516

The applicant's delay was not adequately explained and no arguable grounds of appeal were identified, therefore the application for extension of time must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 12 May 2017
Procedural Posture: Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Outcome: Application for extension of time dismissed
Legal Topics: ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'visa Application Criteria']

['administrative Law' 'migration Law'] ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'judicial Review' 'visa Application Criteria']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Application for Extension of Time to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether delay in filing notice of appeal is adequately explained' 'Whether there is merit in the substantive appeal' "Whether the Department was obliged to advise on 'exceptional reasons'"]

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's delay was not adequately explained and no arguable grounds of appeal were identified, therefore the application for extension of time must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

Application for extension of time dismissed

Orders

["The applicant's application for an extension of time filed on 16 December 2016 be dismissed." "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs fixed in the sum of $1,962.00."]