In the Marriage of Mallet [1984] HCA 21

In the Marriage of Mallet [1984] HCA 21

The exercise of discretion under s. 79 Family Law Act in property settlements must be individualized and based on justice and equity in all the circumstances. There is no legal presumption or starting point of equality in division, even in long marriages, and the appeal court cannot substitute its own view unless...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
['property Settlement After Divorce' 'discretion Under S. 79 Family Law Act' 'assessment of Contributions as Homemaker/parent' 'valuation of Matrimonial Assets' 'costs Orders in Family Proceedings']
['family Law'] ['property Settlement After Divorce' 'discretion Under S. 79 Family Law Act' 'assessment of Contributions as Homemaker/parent' 'valuation of Matrimonial Assets' 'costs Orders in Family Proceedings']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['How a judge exercises discretion under s. 79 of the Family Law Act when determining property interests after divorce' 'Whether there is a legal principle or presumption of equality in property division in cases of long marriage' 'Assessment of contributions made as homemaker or parent versus financial contribution' 'How shares in a family company should be valued for property settlement purposes' 'Entitlement to costs under s. 117 Family Law Act']

Ratio Decidendi

The exercise of discretion under s. 79 Family Law Act in property settlements must be individualized and based on justice and equity in all the circumstances. There is no legal presumption or starting point of equality in division, even in long marriages, and the appeal court cannot substitute its own view unless there is clear error. Bell J.'s orders, including the 20% award for the husband's solely owned assets, fell within his discretion and should be restored.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • ['Judgment of Full Court of Family Court set aside' 'Order that the appeal to Full Court of Family Court be dismissed' 'Original order of Bell J. restored' 'No order as to costs of appeal']