HABIB v. ABC & ANOR [2005] NSWSC 79
No case was made out that the defendants induced the breach by Professor Tennant, nor is there any real risk of irreparable damage to the plaintiff from publication that could not be compensated by damages. Therefore, interlocutory relief restraining publication is refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 February 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Urgent Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Judgment on Application for Interlocutory Injunction
- Outcome
- Application refused. Suppression orders dissolved. Undertakings by defendants discharged. Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Injunction' 'breach of Confidentiality' 'doctor Patient Relationship' 'media Publication']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Urgent Interlocutory Application / Hearing and Judgment on Application for Interlocutory Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the defendants induced a breach of confidentiality between the plaintiff and his psychiatrist' 'Whether interlocutory relief restraining media publication should be granted']
Ratio Decidendi
No case was made out that the defendants induced the breach by Professor Tennant, nor is there any real risk of irreparable damage to the plaintiff from publication that could not be compensated by damages. Therefore, interlocutory relief restraining publication is refused.
Court Disposition
Application refused. Suppression orders dissolved. Undertakings by defendants discharged. Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs.
Orders
- ['Application declined.' 'Each defendant discharged from their undertakings.' 'Suppression orders dissolved.' "Plaintiff to pay defendants' costs." 'Plaintiff to file a summons seeking the orders now applied for.' 'Parties to file short minutes for formal disposition.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment