Regina v Wong [2003] NSWCCA 247

Regina v Wong [2003] NSWCCA 247

Although the applicant's involvement was less than that of certain co-offenders, the difference in non-parole periods, especially compared to Hendy Tandiono, was sufficient to create a justifiable sense of grievance. However, the head sentence appropriately reflected the objective gravity of the offences.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
12 September 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Substantive Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
By majority: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'parity' 'criminal Procedure' 'youth Offenders']
['criminal Law'] ['sentencing' 'parity' 'criminal Procedure' 'youth Offenders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Sentence; Substantive Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the sentence imposed on the applicant was manifestly excessive by reason of disparity with sentences imposed on co-offenders, especially youth offenders and higher-ranking adults' 'Whether a justifiable sense of grievance existed for the applicant due to sentencing discrepancies' 'Appropriate application of the parity principle where co-offenders include juveniles and adults of different levels of involvement']

Ratio Decidendi

Although the applicant's involvement was less than that of certain co-offenders, the difference in non-parole periods, especially compared to Hendy Tandiono, was sufficient to create a justifiable sense of grievance. However, the head sentence appropriately reflected the objective gravity of the offences.

Court Disposition

By majority: Leave to appeal granted. Appeal dismissed.

Orders

  • []