Re G and the Protected Estates Act [2008] NSWSC 722

Re G and the Protected Estates Act [2008] NSWSC 722

Because the protected person had previously been found unable to manage his affairs after severe brain injury, the evidence of recovery was not strong and did not address the 2003 evidence, and the parents/managers were uncontactable with insufficient information about title deeds and estate management, the existing management order should be suspended on an interim basis and management committed to the Protective Commissioner pending further evidence and the managers' return.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 July 2008
Procedural Posture
Protective List Proceedings Concerning Management of a Protected Person's Estate / Ex Tempore Interim Orders on Notice of Motion and Counter Motion
Outcome
Further operation of the order appointing the parents as managers was suspended until further order; management of the protected person's estate was committed to the Protective Commissioner; the motions were stood over.
Legal Topics
["management of Protected Person's Estate" 'suspension of Estate Managers' 'need for Protection' 'medical Evidence of Recovery']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Protective List Proceedings Concerning Management of a Protected Person's Estate / Ex Tempore Interim Orders on Notice of Motion and Counter Motion

  1. 1 ["Whether the further operation of the order appointing the protected person's parents as managers of his estate should be suspended and management committed to the Protective Commissioner." 'Whether the protected person should be declared no longer in need of protection.']

Ratio Decidendi

Because the protected person had previously been found unable to manage his affairs after severe brain injury, the evidence of recovery was not strong and did not address the 2003 evidence, and the parents/managers were uncontactable with insufficient information about title deeds and estate management, the existing management order should be suspended on an interim basis and management committed to the Protective Commissioner pending further evidence and the managers' return.

Court Disposition

Further operation of the order appointing the parents as managers was suspended until further order; management of the protected person's estate was committed to the Protective Commissioner; the motions were stood over.

Orders

  • ['Suspend further operation of the order made by Windeyer J on 6 February 2003 that the parents of the protected person be appointed as managers of the estate of the protected person until further order.' 'Commit the management of the estate of the protected person to the Protective Commissioner.' "Stand the balance...