R v DO, Manh Viet [2001] NSWCCA 19
It was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant's conduct constituted criminal negligence because he knew the danger of pointing a loaded shotgun at someone, loaded the shotgun, moved the safety on and off, pointed it at Mr Le and pulled the trigger several times, creating an extreme and obvious risk that Mr Le would be killed if proper care was not taken.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 February 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From the District Court; Appeal Against Sentence Not Maintained
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'criminal Negligence' 'unsafe or Unsatisfactory Verdict' 'firearms']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction From the District Court; Appeal Against Sentence Not Maintained
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether, on the whole of the evidence, it was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant was guilty of manslaughter by criminal negligence.' "Whether the appellant's act of loading a shotgun, moving the safety on and off, pointing it at the deceased and pulling the trigger constituted criminal negligence."]
Ratio Decidendi
It was open to the jury to be satisfied beyond reasonable doubt that the appellant's conduct constituted criminal negligence because he knew the danger of pointing a loaded shotgun at someone, loaded the shotgun, moved the safety on and off, pointed it at Mr Le and pulled the trigger several times, creating an extreme and obvious risk that Mr Le would be killed if proper care was not taken.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed.
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment