Harvey v Manly Council [2015] NSWLEC 131
Karen Belcher should be joined as her interests and the stricter setback outcome she seeks cannot be adequately addressed without joinder under s 39A(a) of the Court Act, and no delay or disadvantage will result for existing parties.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Joinder Application in Planning Appeal (class 1) / Interlocutory (joinder Application Determined)
- Outcome
- Joinder granted; Karen Belcher ordered to be joined as Second Respondent.
- Legal Topics
- ['joinder of Parties' 'setbacks' 'development Control Plans']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Joinder Application in Planning Appeal (class 1) / Interlocutory (joinder Application Determined)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Karen Belcher should be joined as a party under s 39A of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979']
Ratio Decidendi
Karen Belcher should be joined as her interests and the stricter setback outcome she seeks cannot be adequately addressed without joinder under s 39A(a) of the Court Act, and no delay or disadvantage will result for existing parties.
Court Disposition
Joinder granted; Karen Belcher ordered to be joined as Second Respondent.
Orders
- ['Karen Belcher is joined as Second Respondent to Matter 10461 of 2015.' 'Directions as per Short Minutes of Order dated 16 July 2015 applied.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment