Manly Council v Kelly [2005] NSWLEC 685
The Council was justified in commencing proceedings and achieved much of what it sought through consent orders; however, not all orders were obtained as sought, and Council could not be said to have wholly succeeded. There was no disentitling conduct from Council in not obtaining expert reports, as not required by statute; costs were awarded in part to Council, in the sum of $9,000.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 November 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Costs Application / Judgment on Costs Following Settlement by Consent Orders
- Outcome
- Costs partly awarded to the applicant.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs of Proceedings' 'discretionary Cost Orders' 'consent Orders' 'enforcement of Local Government Orders']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Costs Application / Judgment on Costs Following Settlement by Consent Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Manly Council was entitled to its costs after proceedings resolved by consent orders' 'Whether proceedings were justifiably commenced, continued and settled']
Ratio Decidendi
The Council was justified in commencing proceedings and achieved much of what it sought through consent orders; however, not all orders were obtained as sought, and Council could not be said to have wholly succeeded. There was no disentitling conduct from Council in not obtaining expert reports, as not required by statute; costs were awarded in part to Council, in the sum of $9,000.
Court Disposition
Costs partly awarded to the applicant.
Orders
- ['Order that the respondent pay the applicant (Council) $9,000 in costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment