Manly Council v Angelo [2001] NSWLEC 194
Given the continuing disobedience of court orders by the Respondent, including failure to perform required building works after prior findings of contempt and opportunity for remedy, a more severe penalty in the form of a daily fine is necessary to coerce compliance and uphold the authority of the court.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 August 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt Proceeding / Hearing of Ex Parte Motion for Penalty
- Outcome
- Respondent found guilty of contempt; daily fine imposed
- Legal Topics
- ['disobedience of Court Orders' 'penalties for Contempt' 'substituted Service']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Contempt Proceeding / Hearing of Ex Parte Motion for Penalty
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Respondent is guilty of contempt by disobeying court orders' 'Appropriate penalty for continuing contempt of court']
Ratio Decidendi
Given the continuing disobedience of court orders by the Respondent, including failure to perform required building works after prior findings of contempt and opportunity for remedy, a more severe penalty in the form of a daily fine is necessary to coerce compliance and uphold the authority of the court.
Court Disposition
Respondent found guilty of contempt; daily fine imposed
Orders
- ["Respondent found guilty of contempt as stated in the Statement of Charge annexed to the Council's Notice of Motion filed 20 March 2001." 'A daily fine of $500 imposed while court orders remain unfulfilled.' 'Daily fine to be remitted if specified rectification works are satisfactorily completed within 28 days of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment