Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2013] FCA 1324
The application for extension of time to appeal was refused because the applicant had no prospect of success on appeal, as the Tribunal had afforded procedural fairness and the identified error regarding the overdraft facility would not have affected the independent grounds for its decision.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
- Outcome
- Application refused
- Legal Topics
- ['extension of Time to Appeal' 'procedural Fairness' 'judicial Review' 'jurisdictional Error']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Extension of Time and Leave to Appeal / Judgment on Application for Extension of Time
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant should be granted an extension of time to appeal' 'Whether the Tribunal afforded the applicant procedural fairness' 'Whether the Tribunal committed jurisdictional error in affirming the visa refusal' 'Whether any Tribunal error regarding assessment of an overdraft facility warranted setting aside its decision']
Ratio Decidendi
The application for extension of time to appeal was refused because the applicant had no prospect of success on appeal, as the Tribunal had afforded procedural fairness and the identified error regarding the overdraft facility would not have affected the independent grounds for its decision.
Court Disposition
Application refused
Orders
- ['The application be refused.' 'The applicant pay to the first respondent costs of the application.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment