R v Humphries [2012] NSWSC 419
Humphries is sentenced to imprisonment for a total term of six years for manslaughter, comprising a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months, and a balance of 2 years 3 months, backdated to 15 September 2009, on account of his secondary participation in an unlawful and dangerous act, favorable subjective features, real remorse, guilty plea, and special circumstances for parole.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 01 May 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Sentence
- Outcome
- Sentenced to imprisonment for manslaughter
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'secondary Participation' 'drug Related Homicide' 'sentencing' 'disposal of Body']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Appropriate sentence for manslaughter as a secondary participant in a drug-related killing' 'Aggravating and mitigating features relevant to sentence' 'Amount of discount for utilitarian value of guilty plea']
Ratio Decidendi
Humphries is sentenced to imprisonment for a total term of six years for manslaughter, comprising a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months, and a balance of 2 years 3 months, backdated to 15 September 2009, on account of his secondary participation in an unlawful and dangerous act, favorable subjective features, real remorse, guilty plea, and special circumstances for parole.
Court Disposition
Sentenced to imprisonment for manslaughter
Orders
- ['Sentenced to imprisonment comprising a non-parole period of 3 years 9 months and a balance of 2 years 3 months.' 'The sentence will date from 15 September 2009.' 'Eligible for release on parole upon expiration of non-parole period on 14 June 2013.' 'Total term expires on 14 September 2015.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment