R v Adrian PRESLAND [2009] NSWDC 71
The application for a verdict by direction was declined because there is evidence, though potentially weak, which can be taken into account by the jury and is capable of supporting a verdict; the matter must be left to the jury for its ultimate decision and it cannot be said there is no evidence upon which a properly directed jury could convict.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Accused: Adrian Presland
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 18 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Verdict by Direction (no Case to Answer)
- Outcome
- application for verdict by direction declined
- Legal Topics
- Manslaughter, Criminal Negligence, Verdict by Direction
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Adrian Presland
Accused
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Verdict by Direction (no Case to Answer)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Crown case is capable of establishing the essential ingredients of manslaughter by criminal negligence against the accused
- 2 Whether there is evidence upon which a reasonable jury could find the accused guilty
- 3 Foreseeability of risk of death or serious harm by a reasonable person in the accused's position
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a verdict by direction was declined because there is evidence, though potentially weak, which can be taken into account by the jury and is capable of supporting a verdict; the matter must be left to the jury for its ultimate decision and it cannot be said there is no evidence upon which a properly directed jury could convict.
Court Disposition
application for verdict by direction declined
Orders
- application for acquittal dismissed; trial to proceed for jury determination
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment