R v Tarrant [2016] NSWSC 1155
The offender's impairment by abnormality of mind was accepted as sufficient to reduce murder to manslaughter, but the sentencing judge found it was only the bare minimum required and therefore reduced culpability only modestly. The offence remained objectively very serious because the offender originated the idea of killing the deceased, planned and implemented the killing with Roff over time, drugged the deceased, facilitated Roff's entry and disposal of the body, and the killing occurred in the victim's home and in company. Allowing a combined 33% discount for the plea and assistance, and taking into account remorse, youth, lack of prior convictions, depression, hardship from separation...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 August 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Sentence for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Acquitted Offender of Murder and Found Her Guilty of Manslaughter
- Outcome
- Offender sentenced to imprisonment for manslaughter with a non-parole period of 8 years and a balance of term of 2 years and 8 months.
- Legal Topics
- ['manslaughter' 'substantial Impairment by Abnormality of Mind' 'domestic Relationship Homicide' 'use of Intoxicating Substance' 'planned Criminal Activity' 'plea of Guilty' 'assistance to Authorities' 'remorse' 'rehabilitation' 'non Parole Period']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Sentence for Manslaughter / Sentence After Jury Acquitted Offender of Murder and Found Her Guilty of Manslaughter
Legal Issues
- 1 ['What sentence should be imposed for the manslaughter of Alois Rez after the offender was acquitted of murder on the basis of substantial impairment by abnormality of mind.' "The nature and degree of the offender's abnormality of mind and impairment of faculties under s 23A Crimes Act 1900 (NSW)." "The objective seriousness of the manslaughter, including planning, commission in company, use of sleeping tablets and killing in the victim's home." "The extent of mitigation for the offender's early plea of guilty, remorse, assistance to the Crown, youth, lack of prior convictions, mental condition, prospects of rehabilitation and separation from her children." 'Whether special circumstances justified a balance of term exceeding one third of the non-parole period.']
Ratio Decidendi
The offender's impairment by abnormality of mind was accepted as sufficient to reduce murder to manslaughter, but the sentencing judge found it was only the bare minimum required and therefore reduced culpability only modestly. The offence remained objectively very serious because the offender originated the idea of killing the deceased, planned and implemented the killing with Roff over time, drugged the deceased, facilitated Roff's entry and disposal of the body, and the killing occurred in the victim's home and in company. Allowing a combined 33% discount for the plea and assistance, and taking into account remorse, youth, lack of prior convictions, depression, hardship from separation...
Court Disposition
Offender sentenced to imprisonment for manslaughter with a non-parole period of 8 years and a balance of term of 2 years and 8 months.
Orders
- ['For the manslaughter of Alois Rez at Dubbo on 29 July 2013 Sarah Renea Tarrant is sentenced to imprisonment for a non-parole period of 8 years to commence on 5 November 2015 and to expire on 4 November 2023 and a balance of term of 2 years and 8 months to commence on 5 November 2023 and to expire on 4 July 2026.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment